Kickstart Project Summaries
Local Visions. Shared Learnings. Community-Driven Insights.
The Kickstart Massachusetts program supported 12 communities in exploring the social and/or technical feasibility of networked geothermal as a climate–safe alternative to gas. Each community brought its own motivations, building types, engagement approach, — and each made meaningful strides in uncovering what’s possible.
These short project summaries offer a snapshot of each community’s work. They are designed to help others quickly understand:
- What motivated the community to explore networked geothermal
- Which site or neighborhood was scoped and why
- How the team approached community engagement and what partnerships were forged
- What was learned — including any challenges, surprises, or success stories
- Opportunistic thermal sources the community identified (such as wastewater, seawater, or excess heat)
These are living snapshots of early–stage exploration. But they reflect the thoughtful, grounded work of communities stepping into the energy transition and asking what it could look like on their own streets.
As you read through, we invite you to explore the shared themes, distinct strategies, and big questions these communities are helping us surface — and to consider what a transition rooted in equity, collaboration, and place might look like in your own town.
About The Community
Please provide a snapshot of the community's demographic profile (age groups, ethnic diversity, household types). Briefly mention historical and cultural aspects, including unique traditions or characteristics that set the community apart. Highlight major developments or shifts in the community’s landscape over time (this includes future plans).
Optional:
Please explain any specific EJ-focused considerations of the project, such as prioritizing neighborhoods affected by environmental challenges (e.g., air quality or access to green spaces). Describe how these factors influenced the project’s focus.
Acton, Massachusetts, located 20 miles west of Boston, has a population of approximately 24,000, with a median age of 42 years. The town is family-oriented, with 25% of residents being children or adolescents. While predominantly White, Acton’s population is becoming more diverse, particularly with growing Asian and Hispanic communities. North Acton contains three census blocks designated as Environmental Justice (EJ) communities. The housing stock is a mix of single-family homes, townhouses, and apartments, with 25% of residents renting. Historically a rural farming community, Acton now offers top-ranked public schools, parks, and conservation areas. Major development over the past few decades, especially along Route 2, has transformed Acton into a suburban hub.
Optional:
While for this particular phase of the project, we did not include EJ-focused considerations, our hope is to incorporate that into future phases of this work. We did however, incorporate socio-economic considerations in the feasibility map developed by Sustainability Fellow Hannah Arledge. A screenshot of that map is included below.
Arlington is a town located eight miles west of Boston with a population of approximately 46,000. Race, language, income, and housing tenure, among other characteristics, shape Arlington’s demographics. 73% of the population is white, 14% Asian, 6% two or more races, and 5% Hispanic. Twenty-two percent speak a language other than English at home. Median household income is $125,701 and 25% of the population is low and moderate income. Thirty-nine percent of homes are renter occupied and approximately 42% of residents live in an Environmental Justice (EJ) block group. Arlington’s proximity to Boston, walkability, historic and natural resources, and schools attract and retain residents, including young families.
Optional:
The two anchor sites selected for the Kickstart Grant Feasibility Study in Arlington are the Thompson Elementary School and the nearby Menotomy Manor housing development, which is owned by the Arlington Housing Authority. The school and the housing development were selected in part because they serve many low-income families with children. The area is located in a state designated environmental justice block groupEast Arlington, one of Arlington’s most socioeconomically diverse neighborhoods.
Ashland, over the last few decades has seen a lot of change. Historically a farming town, prominently made up of single-family homes, has seen a growth of condo complexes and apartment buildings. Ashland has a pretty even keel of age demographics for resident ages.
Ashland as a whole is an environmental justice community as designated by the State of Massachusetts, and one census block has been designated an EPA Disadvantaged Community Environmental & Climate Justice block. Ashland has these designations for our minority population as well as the population of low-income residents.
Ashland is a charming community that prides itself on its many outdoor spaces, including 2 State Parks, several water ways, Town Forest, and various trails around town. From Spring to Fall the town lights up with cultural and other town events like Ashland Day, Dragonfly Festival, and Fall Fest. Facing hardship in the 1980s and 1990s, Nyanza chemical dump was linked to a cancer cluster in town, to which the site was declared a Superfund site. The site has been cleaned up and serves as a reminder to the community how important it is to preserve and take care of the environment.
Optional:
Because Ashland is a full EJ community we focused on areas that are also urban heat islands, as found in a 2022 survey conducted by Framingham State University. To capture these areas, we had targeted outreach within these areas. At our targeted outreach we also focused on other tools like MassSave to encourage residents to better insulate and upgrade their homes.
The town Deerfield, MA has a population of just over 5,000. The median age of Deerfield is 45.1 years, and the community is predominantly White (90.3%), with small percentages of Hispanic (6.9%) and Asian (0.1%) residents. The town has both Green Infrastructure and Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) plans which focus on mitigating the impacts of flooding and adoption of sustainable and renewable energy infrastructure.
Gloucester has 29,862 residents, with more than 25% of residents being 65 years or older and 9.7% being born outside of the United States. There are also 3,270 residents who speak English less than “very well”. The median household income is $87,898, which is below the state’s median income (ACS, 2023-2025). Gloucester is known for its historic harborfront and fishing industry, as well as its dedication to fostering the arts.
Founded as a village in 1630, Newton transformed into a small city with the arrival of the Boston and Worcester Railroads in the 19th century. Known for its emphasis on education, environmental stewardship, and its 13 unique neighborhoods, Newton blends tradition with innovation, embracing climate action initiatives and preserving green spaces, while rezoning its village centers to be in compliance with the MBTA Communities Act and to increase sustainable and affordable housing options.
With over 87,000 residents, nearly three quarters of Newton’s population identifies as white; 15% identify as Asian. Asian/Pacific Island languages, Spanish, Russian, and Brazilian Portuguese are the languages other than English most commonly spoken. Nearly 72% of homes are owner-occupied, with most built before 1970.
Lexington is a suburban town in Middlesex County, located just 10 miles from downtown Boston.
Lexington has a population of 34,074. The town’s excellent schools attract many young families, but Lexington is also home to a large population of older adults.
While the town is majority white, it contains significant racial diversity. 60.8% of the population is White, 31.8% is Asian, 1.2% is Black, 2.2% is Hispanic or Latino, and 4.8% identifies as two or more races. 36.9% of the population speaks a language other than English at home.
Lexington is a highly educated community. Some of the largest employers in Lexington include businesses working in biotechnology, defense research, and software fields. The median household income is $202,852, and 3.2% of the population is living in poverty. 82.8% of units are owner occupied.
New Bedford, known as "The City that Lit the World," has a storied maritime history. Once the global hub of the whaling industry, it earned its nickname through the production of whale oil, which illuminated homes and industries worldwide during the 19th century. Today, New Bedford maintains its ties to the sea as America’s leading fishing port, renowned for its extensive fleet and fresh seafood offerings, which are celebrated at the city's many acclaimed restaurants.
The city is home to a population of just over 100,000 residents, representing a diverse mix of age groups. It has a substantial youth population under 18 and a steadily growing senior community. New Bedford’s vibrant ethnic makeup includes robust Portuguese, Cape Verdean, and Hispanic communities, each contributing to the city’s rich cultural fabric. This diversity is celebrated through annual events like the Feast of the Blessed Sacrament, the largest Portuguese festival in the world, as well as other cultural festivals that showcase the city’s heritage and traditions.
In recent decades, New Bedford has undergone significant changes. While its maritime legacy remains central, the city has embraced revitalization, including waterfront redevelopment and an expanding arts and cultural scene. Additionally, the city is at the forefront of the offshore wind energy industry, positioning itself as a leader in renewable energy while honoring its historical role as a pioneer of innovation.
Optional:
Brownfields sites, generally located within Environmental Justice communities, provide unique opportunities to provide geothermal energy. These are often multi-acre vacant sites where assessing the feasibility for geothermal potential can be coupled with assessment and remediation. Reuse planning can more easily incorporate geothermal from the beginning, rather than trying to force geothermal as a retrofit project. The city remains very interested in geothermal at the Morse Cutting Tool site for this very reason. The Morse Cutting Tool site was the source of chlorinated volatile organic compounds and petroleum in soil and groundwater and often resulted in impacts to indoor air in residences and ambient air. After years of impact to this environmental justice community, work to support reuse that contributes to sustainable redevelopment with a clean energy source would benefit this disproportionally affected neighborhood.
Salem, Massachusetts, is a small, historic city on the Massachusetts coast twenty miles North of Boston. With a population of some 45,000, Salem is largely a Caucasian with 19% Hispanics, 4% African Americans and a median age of 38. Actually one of the more diverse communities of the Massachusetts North Shore, Salem is rich in history having been established by Native Americans millennia ago and by the European colonists in 1626. It was one of the largest and wealthiest seaports in early colonial history and is renowned for the Salem witch trials of 1692. This one historical episode overshadows its widespread involvement in the American Revolution, the North American Slave Trade and the dominance of the once powerful Puritan culture and governance. Salem today is a progressive city and a tourist Mecca, especially in the fall around Halloween, when its brick lined streets are overwhelmed by over 1 million visitors.
Somerville is a small city with 80,464 residents in a land area of 4.1 square miles, making it the most densely populated city in New England. Somerville has people of many different backgrounds living in 19 distinct neighborhoods. The city is home to blue-collar families, young professionals, college students, and recent immigrants from a wide range of countries. Two-thirds of Somerville’s residents are renters. Yet, despite the seemingly disparate nature of these groups, the sense of community pride is significant.
Like many industrial cities, Worcester has struggled to rebound from the decline of manufacturing and the loss of employment in the region. As of November, 2024, the unemployment rate for Worcester was 4.5%, approximately 0.6% higher than the Massachusetts unemployment rate (3.9%) and 0.3% higher than the US unemployment rate (4.2%). In an effort to combat the local unemployment rates, Worcester continues to focus on diversifying its economy, building on growth sectors such as biotechnology, healthcare and education.
Sustainability Programs
Please summarize any preceding and parallel sustainability initiatives in the community, such as renewable energy programs or waste reduction efforts. Mention how these intersect with community identity and align with environmental objectives that could intersect with a geothermal network.
While conducting outreach to solicit input on networked geothermal, we published a gas leaks map, using data provided by both National Grid and HEET, found here: https://bit.ly/ActonGasLeaks. Residents often reach out concerned about gas leaks in their street or community and our hope is that this website serves as a resource to both educate on the steps to take when a gas leak is identified and to create awareness on clean energy solutions. We plan to incorporate the findings from the Kickstart Massachusetts grant in this site and to update the gas leaks data on an annual basis with the support of HEET.
A commitment to sustainability is integral to the Arlington community’s identity. Arlington was one of the first municipalities in the state to receive Green Communities designation and is participating in the Fossil Fuel Free Demonstration Program. The Town is implementing its Net Zero Action Plan, which charts a path toward net zero emissions by 2050, and has deployed numerous clean energy, waste reduction, green infrastructure, building efficiency, and sustainable transportation projects. Residents are eager to electrify, and are supported in doing so through the Town’s Electrify Arlington campaign.
With the outreach that was done for this I often partnered with Energize Ashland. Energize Ashland is a new community group to Ashland that encourages and helps aid residents in making upgrades to their homes with the expectation of being more sustainable. This allowed residents to learn about renewable options, weatherization, and other home upgrades that would partner well with networked geothermal.
Deerfield has an active Energy Conservation Committee that has successfully had the town designated a Green Community in the past. Today, residents affiliated with the Committee are seeking designation as a Climate Leader Community which would entail adoption of the so-called “super” stretch-code for buildings, zero-emission vehicle policy and other policies and approaches to move past fossil fuel-based energy. These efforts align with an interest in greater use of geothermal in South Deerfield.
Gloucester’s Community Electricity Aggregation program offers residents three different levels of renewably sourced electricity at varying price points. This gives residents a way to both save money and positively impact the environment. Residents are excited to have the option for their power to be fully renewable or at a higher level than the State currently mandates. As a Green Community of 15 years, Gloucester is a long-standing leader in sustainability.
Newton has many programs supporting sustainability. Green Newton works with community groups, the city and businesses to organize events that promote renewable energy, including the Earth Day festival, the Green Expo and Sustainable Street Tours.
Newton policy also supports the move to electrify buildings and reduce waste: The Ten Communities Act requires electrification of all new building and major renovations; city council is also considering the Building Emissions Reduction and Documentation Ordinance (BERDO) that would require all buildings over 20,000 square feet to reduce emissions to net zero by 2050. The ‘Skip the Stuff’ ordinance reduces waste in restaurants and “Green Coordinators” in each school are working to increase environmental practices, like recycling and composting.
In 2023, the Town completed a climate action and resilience plan, called Resilient Lexington, that serves as the Town’s roadmap for achieving emission reductions community wide, as well as meeting other sustainability goals. Lexington has countless sustainability efforts underway and already completed, including net-zero schools, decarbonization planning and implementation of existing buildings, solar installations, townwide composting, energy efficiency education, and much more. These efforts all contribute to Lexington’s net zero goal and other sustainability goals. The Lexington community is very supportive of sustainability, so moving forward on networked geothermal would be well received.
The City’s NB Resilient initiative is a plan to strengthen our community by preparing for the impact of climate change by creating a roadmap of actions to implement innovative approaches. The strategy focuses on emission reduction, sustainable energy transitions, and waste management efforts.
New Bedford has advanced sustainability through renewable energy programs which focused on increasing residential solar adoption and resulted in significant savings for participating homeowners. Solar power has been a key part of the city’s renewable energy portfolio, with over 16MW in solar installations, New Bedford is recognized as a national leader in solar capacity per capita.
As part of an effort to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050, the current construction of the new state-of-the-art Devalles Elementary School will utilize geothermal heating and cooling in conjunction with solar. This will be an excellent opportunity to educate the community and showcase the new system upon completion.
Additional programs include: a partnership with Siemens that improved energy efficiency across the municipal infrastructure including streetlights and building upgrades; the beginning construction on a bus depot to store and charge 14 fully electric school buses; installation of air quality sensors throughout the city to track air quality; and an ongoing tree initiative increasing tree canopy in target neighborhoods for environmental and energy efficiency benefits.
The city has been a central hub for offshore wind development and a recognized as a national leader. By integrating geothermal heating and cooling, the city can further reduce residential reliance on fossil fuels, aligning with its broader goals of energy efficiency and climate resilience.
St. Peter’s-San Pedro Episcopal Church is working to develop a parallel community solar powered micro grid with a climate resilience hub centered at the church that would help and engage low-income residents of The Point Neighborhood whom it largely serves, during climate emergencies. Plans for the microgrid include using solar power and battery storage extensively across the city, and focusing financial credits derived from the solar powered microgrid on the low-income residents of The Point who are electric utility rate payers, effectively enacting environmental justice in a variety of ways.
The City of Somerville has a robust climate change mitigation and adaptation program. The public outreach and messaging to the community throughout the geothermal study process was that there measures people could undertake right now to reduce their energy burden and climate impacts. This included specific messaging around Somerville’s Energy Advisor position whose role is to assist building owners and particularly rental building occupants with undertaking energy efficiency retrofits.
Worcester has been a sustainability trailblazer for over 15 years, encouraging sustainable development throughout the city. As a designated “Green Community”, Worcester adopted a Specialized Stretch Code, further reaching towards the goal of becoming one of the most sustainable and climate-resilient cities by 2050. Future development within the project area will be required to meet the Specialized Stretch Code and will be encouraged to integrate additional sustainability principles. This approach will strengthen the long-term vision for creating an environmentally-responsible community.
Local Motivation for Geothermal Networks
Please share the story of why this project matters to the community, touching on issues like energy costs, climate vulnerability, and access to reliable resources. Connect these to the project's goals, showing how it addresses residents' needs.
Networked geothermal offers a solution toward addressing energy costs, reducing environmental impact, and improving access to reliable, sustainable heating and cooling in Acton. A survey and discussions revealed that many residents are seeking cost-effective, energy-efficient solutions due to high heating costs from less efficient systems. Geothermal offers a sustainable, renewable alternative, with shared systems potentially reducing installation and operational costs. Residents also support geothermal for its environmental benefits, aiming to lower greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. The project is especially beneficial for areas with aging infrastructure, providing a reliable energy source. Geothermal networking enhances energy independence, resilience, and accessibility, offering a potentially affordable transition to renewable energy for all residents.
The Town's 2021 Net Zero Action Plan (NZAP) directs the Town to “Partner with utilities and others to promote neighborhood-scale shared ground source heat pump projects to help transition Arlington away from natural gas and toward all-electric buildings.” Indeed, Arlington cannot achieve equitable decarbonization of its approximately 12,000 buildings via individual building electrification upgrades alone. Importantly, many residents are unable to electrify their buildings for reasons of cost, time, effort, and housing tenure. There are tremendous efficiency gains and cost savings associated with networked, ground-source systems. Operational cost savings, in particular, are crucial for residents as well as for the Town, as energy costs are straining household and municipal budgets in Arlington.
Ashland residents instantly became very interested in the possibility of networked geothermal for various reasons. Ashland has the goal of Net Zero by 2040 and Networked Geothermal heavily aligns with that goal.
In addition, many residents were approaching me saying their homes in the next few years will need a boiler replacement making now the best time to be looking at something like Networked Geothermal, and finally it makes upgrades more affordable and accessible for many residents. Many residents that I have talked to have looked at geothermal as an option but were stopped due to the cost, and this makes it geothermal an option for our residents.
Climate change is often front of mind for the Town’s leadership. Most recently, severe flooding events in 2016 and 2023 that devastated roads brought home the changing nature of weather events and the need to adapt. The Town was the first in the Commonwealth to enter into the Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) program and has funded half a dozen projects through this program aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change. Beyond this, Berkshire Gas, the area’s natural gas utility, has placed this portion of Franklin County under a gas hookup moratorium, citing “pipeline deliverability constraints.” This combination and the burgeoning changes to the Town’s Municipal Campus (discussed below) have fueled an interest in the potential for networked geothermal.
This project would reduce the utility-cost burden the senior community in Lincoln Park faces and create a more comfortable working/living environment for residents in Lincoln Park, students and staff at Gloucester High School, and families utilizing the local food pantry and social services. Making these spaces comfortable, reliably cooled/heated, and running at all times of the year is critical to best serve the needs of Gloucester’s residents.
Newton developed a climate action plan because city leaders and residents recognize the threat of climate change. Flooding and severe storms have already impacted the community, and with New England warming faster than the rest of the country, the community understands that we need to take every promising opportunity we have to fight climate change on a local level.
Gas leaks are also a significant health and environmental challenge in Newton. Residents are increasingly concerned about threats to their own health and the rate at which gas leaks are killing trees throughout the city. Networked geothermal will build on the momentum in the community to address climate change and protect residents from gas emissions by replacing gas with water pipes.
The Town of Lexington is deeply committed to sustainability. The Town has a goal to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 and has been a leader in Massachusetts in pursuing innovative climate solutions for decades. Not only is Lexington driven by the need to rapidly reduce emissions to minimize its contribution to climate change, but also to protect anyone who lives, works, or visits Lexington from the growing vulnerabilities that are accompanying the climate crisis, including power outages, impacts from extreme weather, and rising energy costs.
This geothermal project is vital for New Bedford, where residents face rising energy costs and climate vulnerability, including the threat of severe storms and coastal flooding. Many areas, particularly those near older infrastructure, face issues like gas leaks and service constraints. By utilizing a currently vacant formerly contaminated lot such as the former Morse Cutting Tool site, the project not only enhances neighborhood sustainability but also reduces reliance on fossil fuels. It provides a reliable and affordable heating and cooling solution, stabilizing energy costs and improving access to energy in underserved areas. The project aligns with New Bedford’s goals of climate resilience, environmental sustainability, and creating cleaner, more resilient communities.
St. Peter’s-San Pedro Church is a 15,000-sf facility in the center of Salem that is heated by a large, old, gas fired steam boiler serving three 19th century connected buildings. In late 2022, National Grid appeared requesting to change the gas meter at the church and, subsequently, the gas bill skyrocketed from $100/month to $3,000/month overnight due to a malfunctioning gas meter. This relatively small but vibrant and growing parish that provides vital community services to those who are marginalized in Salem cannot sustain such high costs for heat and, further, our commitment to doing whatever we can to reverse global warming demands that we replace our aging steam boiler with a sustainable, green energy solution. Could we establish a geothermal bore field in our parking lot? Could we partner with our neighbor businesses, the City of Salem, Salem public housing, multifamily buildings and residences to establish a networked geothermal system that could replace our dependence upon fossil fuels for both heat and cooling in our neighborhood? These are some of the questions that are fueling our project and defining our goals to become a proactive, green church in the center of Salem that leads by example and supports the most vulnerable in our community.
Somerville is a dense urban community with an aged housing stock and a high number of rental households with a disproportionate energy burden. The prospect of geothermal energy networks serving the community was well received by the community as a whole, with several hundred community members responding to our outreach and expressing interest in the technology. The number one question we received was “when can I get this on my street?” The project goals of finding viable geothermal energy networks in multiple locations across Somerville would serve the public’s need for an efficient zero-carbon energy source they could use to decarbonize their buildings in furtherance of the community’s Climate Forward Agenda.
Many industries have converted their energy systems from coal to natural gas due to the negative environmental
considerations associated with use of coal in energy generation, as well as the lower price of natural gas. Over a period,
the Northeast has seen an increase in delivery costs for both natural gas and electricity. Due to the high level of conversion
and availability of fuel, the capacity of existing pipelines is taxed, and prices continue to escalate.
The proposed project area has a documented shortage of natural gas supply and outdated, deficient electrical
infrastructure to service the site. By upgrading these systems, the community will benefit by enhancing energy reliability,
reducing costs, improving resiliency and transitioning to cleaner energy sources within the system.
Site Selection
Give an overview of the site selection considerations. Additionally, share a site map and location of a single preferred site. Describe the level of readiness of this community to adopt geothermal.
The two anchor sites studied through this grant, the Thompson Elementary School and Menotomy Manor affordable rental housing development (in which tenants pay their utility bills), were chosen because they serve low-income families and children in one of Arlington’s most socioeconomically diverse neighborhoods.
The site selection for Deerfield's geothermal project involved evaluating several factors, including bedrock thermal conductivity, groundwater resources, building energy needs, and existing infrastructure. Key considerations included the depth to bedrock, proximity to thermal sources, and the presence of mixed-use buildings to optimize system efficiency. The project team identified three potential iterations for the geothermal network, each with varying scales and complexities.
The preferred site is the southern portion of Deerfield and encompasses 25 buildings, including Deerfield Town Hall, Deerfield Police Department, Tilton Library, and Deerfield Elementary. This site was chosen due to its central location and the opportunity to integrate waste heat from Berkshire Brewing Company, which produces 6,000 barrels of beer annually. The network in this area is approximately 11,000 feet in length.
Community readiness was mixed, with only Frontier Regional School responding via email. Additional community outreach should be completed in the future, particularly for residents along the network.
This site was chosen based on existing grid constraints and would connect several critical organizations that serve low-income families, veterans, fishermen, and senior citizens. This community is ready and eager to deploy networked geothermal, and there is even buy-in from prospective developers to be included on this microgrid. Our partners and stakeholders representing the community have specifically identified a microgrid as a desirable technology and asset to serving Gloucester’s environmental justice communities.
Hartwell Ave was chosen as the most advantageous site for further development of the networked geothermal system. Hartwell Ave is located on the northwestern edge of Lexington. It is a primary street in a commercial zone, predominantly hosting large offices, labs, and life sciences buildings. It was identified based on the concentration of high energy users, and its potential for increasingly diverse building types from the new multifamily zoning districts.
The site has many surface-level parking areas and adjacent land suitable for geothermal well field retrofits. The Town of Lexington has plans to rework Hartwell Ave soon, allowing for the design and placement of the networked geothermal system. Although the current mix of building types is heavy in office/lab space, the area has been rezoned for mixed-use and high-occupancy residential living, offering future diversity. There are already two large multifamily residential developments in the pipeline.
There is serious interest from building owners in connecting to a networked geothermal system. The Town would be ready to move forward with the support of a utility.
The church is situated in the center of Salem’s historic district with narrow streets, a mixture of residential, commercial, and multifamily structures that experiences the full impact of Salem’s tourist season from May through November. Immediate neighbors include the City of Salem, National Park Service, the Peabody Essex Museum and its many adjoining properties, a large bank, a brewery, three large public housing facilities, numerous commercial structures and an historic residential neighborhood. There are at least two large city owned public spaces in the area that, combined with existing private parking lots (including the lot at St. Peter’s Church), could become bore field sites for our proposed system. In addition, Salem’s public sewer system beneath the area streets, the low depth to the naturally occurring sea water table, the proximity of coastal estuaries and relatively short depth to bedrock all offer potential access to ground source heat. In short, to quote one voice from our study, “If there was ever a concise area filled with diverse yet complimentary structures and resources amenable to geothermal networking, this is it.”
Somerville is a dense community with closely spaced multi-family buildings and small businesses spread throughout the city. The particular site selected for this study, the Central Hill Area, included several blocks of this “typical” Somerville building typology along with multiple large Municipal buildings that could be anchor buildings for the network as well as several potential open areas for borefields (which is a scarce resource in Somerville). The neighborhood in the site selected had a high level of interest and excitement regarding the project which was in-line with the community reaction as a whole. The barriers to adoption of geothermal were the same barriers to adopting energy efficiency measures generally, that is to say older buildings with implementation challenges, along with a high proportion of rental households with the “split incentive problem” of undertaking efficiency improvements in rental housing stock.
Many industries have converted their energy systems from coal to natural gas due to the negative environmental considerations associated with use of coal in energy generation, as well as the lower price of natural gas. Over a period, the Northeast has seen an increase in delivery costs for both natural gas and electricity. Due to the high level of conversion and availability of fuel, the capacity of existing pipelines is taxed, and prices continue to escalate. The proposed project area has a documented shortage of natural gas supply and outdated, deficient electrical infrastructure to service the site. By upgrading these systems, the community will benefit by enhancing energy reliability, reducing costs, improving resiliency and transitioning to cleaner energy sources within the system.
Community Partners
Please describe key community groups (nonprofits, associations) that were instrumental in outreach and trust-building. Describe their role in information sharing and community involvement in the project.
Two community groups, Mother’s Out Front and Energize Acton, played a key role in helping to share flyers of the survey and information about events we hosted on networked geothermal. They also provided key insights on suitable networked geothermal locations in town and also provided feedback on our survey questions.
The Town’s main project team consisted of the Sustainability Manager, Environmental Planner/Conservation Agent, and a summer graduate student fellow. Several key staff from the departments of Planning & Community Development and Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion shaped the engagement plan, and staff and volunteers affiliated with the Electrify Arlington campaign, Clean Energy Future Committee, and Sustainable Arlington supported outreach. Key community partners included the Arlington Public Schools and Arlington Housing Authority, which owns and operates the Menotomy Manor housing development, as well as Mothers Out Front Arlington, Arlington EATS, and Arlington Community Education. Leaders, staff, and volunteers from these entities supported outreach, particularly for key events such as tabling at the Electrify Arlington Fair, Farmers Market, Town Day, National Night Out, and the culminating public “Geo Power” forum in October 2024. These partners helped to organize and spread the word about events, educate residents, distribute flyers around town and near the feasibility study site, and more.
In keeping with the broader commitment of the community to sustainability and decarbonization, all partners involved are excited by the prospect of a geothermal project in Arlington. For the Arlington Public Schools and Arlington Housing Authority, which oversee the two anchor sites, the prospect of enhanced comfort and reduced utility bills is very appealing. The primary barrier challenging the level of commitment of these entities is the significant upfront cost of the project, which becomes less of a deterrent if external funding can be obtained to offset this cost.
We coordinated with various community groups including Energize Ashland which is made up of a few long-term Ashland residents who made other long-term residents-built trust with our process. In addition, we worked with the Ashland Indians who invited us to celebrations like Diwali. Ashland has a growing Indian population, so connecting with the Ashland Indians group was a great trust builder.
In addition we partnered with town groups like the senior center and passed out flyers at the food pantry which had positive reactions. It was very important to us to bring in community groups into this process because we wanted to make sure we were including every type of resident.
The Town of Deerfield has a very active Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) Core Group and Energy Commission. These two groups, as well as the UMass Landscape and Regional Planning (LARP), performed public outreach through public meetings, informational forums, newsletters and social media. Their role in information sharing and commitment in green energy initiatives and promotion were instrumental in gathering feedback from the local community regarding a potential geothermal project.
The MVP Core Group and Energy Commission hold regular monthly meetings, often meeting twice a month. Both groups consistently create presentations for community informational sessions. Presentations include digital slides and paper handouts. UMass LARP has consistently been a resource for the two Town committees. UMass LARP helped develop the outreach material for forums and distribution. Meetings and forums were recorded and posted on the Town’s YouTube channel for public consumption. All committee members and participants in this project had a high level of passion and commitment in the feasibility study.
The Deerfield Town Administration also played a role in community outreach. In particular, the Town’s Planning and Economic Development Coordinator attended HEET meetings and kept the MVP and Energy Commission informed of project developments and progress. All parties mentioned above made numerous attempts to engage and solicit feedback from local businesses and entities that had a stake in the geothermal network feasibility study.
There were no major community partners outside these Town-affiliated groups except for Frontier Regional School who responded with interest and supplemental information.
Maureen Aylward, the director of TownGreen, a local climate advocacy non-profit that works towards a better understanding of the resilience and climate issues faced by Cape Ann, supports municipal partners in implementing solutions and organizing volunteers and educators to move climate solutions forward. TownGreen has been a long-term partner with the City in engaging and educating the Gloucester community, offering education programs focusing on climate awareness and action. Their connections across the community and access to volunteers, including technical advisors, are a great asset to this project. TownGreen is the lead on community engagement for this project.
TownGreen committed to hosting two in-person information sessions concerning geothermal; one at Gloucester’s Rose Baker Senior Center, which is located in an environmental justice community, and the second at Gloucester High School (within the project study area) to engage students in the future of clean energy and to provide an opportunity to enhance their studies. After the event, Maureen provided a debrief where she summarized key takeaways from engagement and community input.
TownGreen is a main partner in this project and is continuing to work with the City, post-feasibility study, to support bore hole drilling tests at the chosen site and continue to educate the community on the benefits of networked geothermal microgrids.
Although the city has not been formally involved in developing the pilot, the city’s approval of the project was critical. Green Newton worked diligently throughout the summer and fall to demonstrate the existence of a legal pathway allowing a private operator to manage any potential geothermal pilot.
We also received support from numerous individual City Councilors who are interested in moving Newton away from its dependence on fossil fuel. These councilors are helping with community outreach and several attended the community meeting held at the Countryside School in November.
Finally, other Newton community groups helped to publicize the community meeting and several of their members are engaged as home visit volunteers.
The project team consisted of Town staff (sustainability, economic development, engineering), a Town Select Board member, a resident, a system engineer, a mechanical engineer, and a developer. With the wide range of skills and insights the project team was well equipped to meet additional partners where they were in their knowledge. One of the most critical partners engaged through the process were building owners within the proposed site. From these partners, the team could gauge project support from future customers and could collect building system information and usage data to refine our feasibility study.
The broader Lexington community was also a key partner in this study because understanding of the technology and buy-in from the community would be key to the successful development of a networked geothermal installation, even if their homes would not immediately have the opportunity to connect to the loop. Over the course of the feasibility study, the project team partnered with groups such as the Lexington Climate Action Network and the Sustainable Lexington Committee to get the word out about the project. The project team also tabled at several townwide events to share information about the concept.
Neighborhoods United, a collective of local neighborhood groups including the Brooklawn Neighborhood Association and Cove Street Neighborhood Association, played an essential role in engaging the community and spreading awareness about the project. These groups facilitated information-sharing with the residents, helping to ensure broad participation and support.
The New Bedford Housing Authority (NBHA) helped establish initial communication for the geothermal network project, opening the door for potential collaboration and trust building with residents in future sustainability initiatives. While their role was limited during this phase, it laid a foundation for significant opportunities moving forward.
HEET was pivotal to the project’s success, providing funding, expertise, strategic support and fostering connections with local municipalities. Their leadership strengthened the city’s capacity to integrate geothermal technology while fostering awareness and enthusiasm among stakeholders, positioning the project as a model for sustainable energy solutions.
The area businesses, the City of Salem, the Peabody Essex Museum and the Salem Housing Authority, among others, have been hugely supportive of the concept of networked geothermal energy in the center of this community. All have been forthcoming with the necessary information, building access and communication to make this study possible. Several have consistently met with our study group to share insight and to explore possibilities as the study progressed. Some new partners emerged including one large apartment complex that is very eager to see the study become a reality especially considering that their 14 separate boilers in their complex are approaching their end-of-life cycle. Interest from residents has also been strong through our community outreach activities.
Community involvement and input has always been of utmost importance for NGP projects. For the Greendale Revitalization Initiative, NGP engaged with the surrounding community and City leaders prior to the acquisition of the ~51-acres to ensure the vision for the proposed project area is clear and complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. NGP has provided the community stakeholders with draft conceptual plans and has kept continuous lines of communication open during demolition and remediation efforts. The stakeholders that have been engaged in this project, include, but are not limited to: the City of Worcester Administration and the Worcester City Council District Councilor, the Abby Kelley Foster Public Charter School, the North Worcester Business Association, and the Norton Retirees. Through these stakeholders, NGP has been able to gather feedback on the overall redevelopment of the site and identify potential impacts and/or concerns to ensure these are considered as the development plan evolves.
NGP’s proactive engagement with these community partners has worked to ensure the most transparent and collaborative development process. NGP remains committed to maintaining these partnerships and keeping open dialogue to ensure the project’s long-term success and community benefit.
Community Engagement
Please summarize community engagement strategies implemented and insights gained, noting the level of interest and co-benefits of geothermal networks that resonated the most with local stakeholders.
The Town of Acton engaged the community on the networked geothermal project through surveys, webinars, movie nights, trivia events, and social media. The postcard promoting the survey was the most successful, increasing our number of respondents from around 50 to 214 responses. While less effective at garnering survey responses, the webinar, movie screening, and Trivia Night provided a unique opportunity for more in-depth conversations on networked geothermal questions. Direct mailers, like those for the Heat Pump Pizza Party, brought in 130 attendees. Geothermal interest was high, with residents valuing cost savings, environmental benefits, energy independence, and community collaboration. Concerns included high initial costs and technical feasibility.
The project team employed a variety of engagement methods throughout the project. Initial engagement focused on 1:1 conversations that ensured alignment among Town staff regarding the approach to the feasibility study and outreach. Small group and 1:1 conversations were also conducted with the Arlington Public Schools, Arlington Housing Authority, and Arlington Recreation Department to discuss the proposed project anchors and borefield location at North Union Park. These conversations provided opportunities for leaders of these entities to ask questions about the technology, cost, and project timing addressed. They were concerned primarily about who would fund the project and whether operational costs would increase. The Town’s Project Team also connected with representatives from the pilot projects in Boston and Framingham, who provided insights into collaborating with the utilities, lessons on engaging public housing residents about networked geothermal, and perspectives on funding, partnerships, and process.
Conversations throughout the summer and fall expanded into the broader community and key partners both within and beyond Arlington’s borders, including partners at state agencies and local community-based organizations. Individuals representing these entities shared insights into funding opportunities, community interest, and volunteer capacity.
Beginning in the late spring, through the fall, the project team focused on getting out the word through tabling opportunities and planned events. These events provided opportunities for education regarding the technology and proposed project, as well as a chance to gauge interest from residents in a geothermal project in East Arlington.
For the most part, those engaged were highly interested in the idea of geothermal projects in Arlington, not just at the proposed site. Co-benefits cited included operational cost savings, efficiency, equitable and neighborhood-scale decarbonization, reduction of grid stress, and the opportunity to simultaneously retire the gas network/address gas leaks. Many residents wanted to know when and how they could participate in the networked geothermal project in Arlington, and whether they should wait to pursue electrification of their individual homes in order to participate (given the uncertainty of the project feasibility and timing, the project team encouraged these individuals to go ahead with their individual electrification plans).
We started our outreach via town newspapers, social media, and posters in community centers. After the initial outreach I received many emails from residents who were interested in having networked geothermal in their neighborhoods. From the people that reached out we hosted neighborhood popups with coffee and informational handouts to build larger neighborhood support. These were well attended and residents who stopped by were very interested in taking the next steps for their neighborhoods.
In addition to neighborhood targeted pop ups we tabled at many preexisting events like Ashland Day, Dragonfly Festival, Diwali celebrations and more. These existing events each pulled a couple hundred residents in attendance which led to many residents having interest in networked geothermal.
We hosted a pumpkin smash which was a first this year where residents brought pumpkins to smash, played climate carnival games, and learned all about Networked geothermal.
This is a long term project and hopefully we will have multiple networked geothermal systems throughout the community. To make sure we continue our community outreach this will be a continued education within the community including a booth in two weeks at the town holiday fair, and the town subscribed to two local and international geothermal organizations that will provide continued education, promotional materials, and access to trainings to town staff and interested residents.
Key project team members included Tim Hilchey, Selectboard Chair and Denise Mason, Planning Board Chair, as well as the Town’s former Planning & Economic Development Coordinator and current Town Administrator, Christopher Dunne. This core group engaged several committees and boards:
On July 30, 2024, the project team presented the initial parameters of the feasibility study to the Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) Core Group. The project team presented a slideshow detailing the Feasibility study funded by the HEET Grant and background on what a Geothermal District entails. Pilot locations (Framingham and Lowell) were discussed. The project team also spoke to incorporating anchor business such as Pelican, Tree House, and Berkshire Brewing on to the Municipal System.
On July 31, 2024, the project team did the same for the Energy Conservation Committee. Presentation from Buro Happold, Engineers who are performing our Geothermal feasibility study. The meeting facilitated sharing of the Solar Action Plan from MA CEC for electrical data. Information shared about possible Sites. Questions addressed included timeline, operator, sale of excess heat to the network, use of excess farmland and opportunity to bury utility lines.
The project team also reached out to stakeholders with the regional school system as well as the other entities that could serve as opportunistic thermal resources discussed below. The primary form of community outreach was via email and only to commercial anchor tenants. Future outreach should focus on residential areas along the proposed network.
On October 13, 2024, students from the University of Massachusetts Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning (UMass LARP) presented on landscape architecture interventions to assist with decarbonization and energy transition, including geothermal options. The prior year, students had familiarized themselves with installation of geothermal wells, and how this construction can be used to strategically improve public areas, increased energy efficiency through landscape interventions, and finding alternative sources of energy through the use of compost, etc. In partnership with the Town of Deerfield, students met with the Energy Conservation Committee and designed high-level interventions for the municipal campus and met with the Kickstart study’s consultant team.
TownGreen and the City of Gloucester facilitated community engagement through public meetings, surveys, door-to-door outreach, and student-oriented presentations.We found that doing surveys to gauge interest and knowledge of geothermal systems and then post presentations and demonstrations provided evidence that the public meetings were successful in their goals of education and engagement in the subject. These presentations brought in local geothermal installers, National Grid, and CHA to speak to residents across a range of ages, incomes, and education levels.Having events at different venues and going directly to local businesses and schools sparks interest and conversations around geothermal.What resonated with residents was the realization that geothermal wells are feasible for residents, too. It wasn’t some concept out of reach or intangible, it can be installed in their homes and directly benefit them. Increasing awareness of these benefits helped residents understand geothermal can benefit them directly as well as support the City’s climate resiliency goals.
Green Newton organized a meeting to educate the community about the benefits of networked geothermal and identify potential pilot participants in the Countryside School neighborhood. Outreach included social media posts, local press outlets, emails from local organizations, and distribution of postcards/displays at community events.
We also distributed 250 door hangers and handed out over 100 postcards at Countryside School/in the neighborhood. Despite the targeted outreach, we do not think it brought people to the community meeting; less than half a dozen people of the 70 attendees were from the neighborhood.
However, we have identified people who have agreed to a home visit by one of our volunteers who will gather heating/cooling information and request additional community contacts.
The project team relied on a mix of engagement strategies over the course of the project. They hosted a community information session for the general public. The audience response was generally positive. Most of the questions focused on the potential and possible barriers to residential development, the implications for residents who have already adopted air source heat pumps, and whether gas systems would be completely replaced in a future town-wide build-out.
The project team also staffed a table in the Town’s sustainability tent at the annual Discovery Day event on May 25, where hundreds of residents attended to learn about local organizations and businesses. We had signage about the Networked Geothermal project, and engaged in conversations with a few dozen attendees.
The feasibility study project team met with property owners of buildings at the various candidate sites to discuss the feasibility study and collect feedback from various stakeholder perspectives. Both presenter and attendees spoke to the great potential of networked geothermal to be a solution to get off fossil fuels and be in compliance with new state and local codes. Attendees noted the need for coordination of this sort of project by a utility to give building owners certainty about the project’s success and timeline, as well as a better understanding of the upfront and ongoing costs. Other takeaways are summarized in the final report for the project.
Multiple methods of outreach were used. The NB Resilient Dashboard is located on the city’s website and gains the most visibility towards sustainability initiatives. The site is regularly updated with information about geothermal energy and other initiatives and is a typical starting point for different stakeholders including residents, business owners, and contractors. For additional community outreach, we launched an online survey and by collaborating with community-based organizations, we offered informal information sessions at specific neighborhood meetings and libraries. The survey and sessions were advertised through social media, postcard mailers, and flyers. The survey included a short educational geothermal video and specific questions.
Postcards were the most successful outreach method used in gaining responses, and while being aware that voluntary response bias may impact the results, some valuable input was gathered. Of the survey takers, single family homeowners who heat with natural gas were the largest single group of respondents (85%). Responses were overwhelmingly positive towards interest in further education on networked geothermal energy, with most respondents (68%) even indicating interest in being considered for pilot programs. The most frequent factors cited as driving this interest include potential energy cost-savings (27%) and a desire to participate in green energy solutions to promote clean energy solutions and reduce fossil fuel reliance (60%). The few uncertain responses (29%) cited lack of knowledge about the solution and no-interest responses (4%) cited concern about upfront cost and disruption due to construction. Positively, over 60% of respondents requested to stay informed on networked geothermal energy initiatives. From responses, we gained valuable insight into the areas of further education needed which center around logistics for the initial conversion of a home heating system, potential hazards, and expense vs cost-savings.
From the start, this project has been focused on engaging our neighbors in the concept of exploring a networked geothermal system in our neighborhood. Extensive outreach was conducted 1:1 and in small groups where our study engineers joined our study leaders in introductory meetings with area businesses and our public housing neighbors. Although there were often lots of questions about the implementation of such a project, the interest was keen especially when the long-term cost savings and positive environmental impacts were discussed. In addition, conversations with neighbors who had properties that could conceivably be used as prosumer sites where their ground source energy could be sold to the system or utility were very positive and provided new opportunities to consider revenue generating sources not previously considered possible. Overall, the opportunity to bring forward new ways for individuals and commercial entities to collaborate on a green energy solutions that would positively impact climate change and significantly reduce or eliminate fossil fuel consumption and be cost effective were very well received.
To date, the city engaged the public on the prospect of networked geothermal in two main ways: educating residents living in study areas about the prospect of networked geothermal and ways they can support the study, and engaging the broader Somerville community about networked geothermal; increasing awareness and interest. Due to the high turnover rates of Somerville’s population, and the longer-term timeline associated with potential networked geothermal engagement efforts were focused on city-wide education and engagement. The prospect of a more efficient HVAC system to decarbonize their buildings was the number one benefit that resonated with most stakeholders.
To target residents living within the study areas, postcards and doorhangers of information about the technology were sent to residents (approximately 890 households). These print materials communicated information about networked geothermal and invited residents to two virtual town hall meetings.
To target all city residents, information about the initiative was distributed to the entire community through the city’s main information channel as well as the Somerville’s Office of Sustainability and Environment community newsletter and social media channels.20 Additional in-person engagement occurred at the onset of the project with tabling at the Somerville Winter Farmers Market. City staff engaged interested residents with an interactive diagram of networked geothermal system in heating and cooling seasons; increasing knowledge and interest within the community at large.
All engagement efforts led to two virtual community town hall meetings. These were held December 9, 2024 and January 8, 2025 with approximately 100 community attendees. Both virtual meetings covered an introduction to the project, “Networked Geothermal 101,” current energy efficiency opportunities in Somerville, and ended with Q&A. Resident attendees had many questions showing interest and excitement in the prospect of networked geothermal.
In addition to these meetings, the city also prepared a survey to gather information about the building stock of residents living in each study area, as existing building conditions can inform the level of complexity needed to retrofit a building to be compatible with a networked geothermal system.
NGP has utilized several outreach methods to ensure the community is regularly updated on project progress and has opportunities to ask questions and/or provide input. In addition to the traditional forms of communication like public meetings, NGP has expanded its community outreach to digital formats (NGP website, social media channels, etc.). This medium has provided the opportunity to reach a broader audience who may not be aware of this redevelopment initiative. NGP also uses social media platforms to show the progress of the cleanup and redevelopment project, provide information and resources to educate the public, and encourage discussions related to the environmental issues and economic development in the City of Worcester. NGP also utilizes Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn and Instagram to disseminate information. Through these accounts, NGP is able to obtain metrics to help understand who we are reaching as well as the success of the posts, further allowing the opportunity to curate posts to ensure relevancy and interest to the greater Worcester audience.
Opportunistic Thermal Resources
Please summarize any unique thermal resources (e.g., bodies of water or geothermal sites) identified and provide location or map.
Sustainability Fellow, Hannah Arledge, built a suitability index to identify potential locations for networked geothermal. The sites identified in the map below may be suitable for networked geothermal due to their inclusion of affordable and subsidized housing, location in proximity to gas leak hotspots, and geohydrological grade of "most suitable" or "more suitable."
We are located near the existing Framingham networked geothermal loop. In addition, Ashland hosts part of Waushakum Pond, which is also in Framingham.
The feasibility study identified several unique thermal resources along the potential network. Waste heat from local breweries, such as Berkshire Brewing Company and Tree House Brewing, and plastic molding company Pelican Products could be integrated into the network to enhance thermal efficiency. No major water bodies are located nearby that could represent significant thermal resources in this location.
The Annisquam River runs between the wastewater treatment plant and Gloucester High School as pictured below. Both the wastewater treatment plant and the Annisquam River were identified as unique thermal resources that could potentially be utilized by the network; however, these resources face several barriers, such as permitting, erosion, and low flow, that prevent them from being included in the utility network.
Two Newton schools (Countryside and Franklin) are installing geothermal systems. These schools are located in residential areas and offer good opportunities to explore a networked geothermal system because the school offers a diverse energy source in relation to the schools.
Hartwell Ave has 12” sanitary sewer and 18” domestic water mains nearby that can be used for waste heat recovery. Strategically locating a pump house for the ATL with heat recovery stations located inside the structure would be advantageous. There is also a municipally owned compost facility nearby that could potentially be used in the future, but it is not directly adjacent to the site and is also on a capped landfill, which may make it challenging to leverage.
We are in the process of constructing a new Elementary School that will utilize geothermal heating/cooling and incorporate solar. The site demonstrates favorable thermal conditions for a closed-loop geothermal system. The shallow bedrock depth (10–30 feet) and thermal conductivity of ~1.5 BTU/(hr·ft·°F) support the use of 500-foot-deep single U-bend wells. The planned well field, located north of the school near the soccer field, avoids utilities and tree roots, making it viable for geothermal installation. These conditions and strategic placement minimize costs and ensure efficient heat exchange, providing a robust model for nearby locations. This will be an excellent opportunity to explain the geothermal process from the beginning to end.
The study was solely focused on the use of significant bore fields from which to extract or contain heat for the system; however, the concept of extracting heat from other sources including effluent, nearby coastal estuaries and the proximity to sea water in the ground at sea level were noted. Also, extensive exploration of the use of rejected heat from fossil fuel heating systems was considered. Although one large entity in the study produces a significant quantity of rejected heat, our engineers found that it was not economically suitable to connect that heat to the networked geothermal system at this time.
The Central Hill Area imagined municipal property locations for the borefields in currently paved areas so the fields could be done with minimal disruption. There is also the possibility of the Mystic River being used as a thermal resource for the city as a whole but it was not included in this specific study area due to adjacency considerations.
There is a large surface body of water, Indian Lake, that is located ~0.5 miles from the project site and proposed borefield; however, this body of water has not been considered as a component of any potential geothermal system. The municipally-owned and maintained lake is utilized for various recreational activities and is subject to significant drainage during the winter months. Additionally, a major interstate highway is between the lake and project site, creating greater complications that may not be cost effective and/or feasible to consider as a component of a networked geothermal system.
Opportunities for the Future
Identify new opportunities that emerged from community conversations, like potential partnerships, increased awareness about energy resilience, or needs for educational programs. Mention any new relationships formed with local organizations or potential collaborations for future sustainability projects.
One key takeaway from community conversations was the increased awareness around energy resilience, with many residents expressing interest in learning more about renewable energy options and energy efficiency. This highlights the importance of supporting and further developing resources like Acton’s Clean Energy Coaching program. This program offers ongoing consultations through trained community volunteers, helping residents and building owners adopt energy-efficient technologies like heat pumps, solar, and electric vehicles. The large number of attendees at the Heat Pump Pizza Party also demonstrates the desire for residents to learn more about heat pump adoption and alternative heating and cooling systems. The Clean Energy Coaching program plays an important role in filling the need for more resources and information and supporting residents and businesses in the clean energy transition.
Community conversations contributed to increased understanding and excitement about networked geothermal systems and ground-source heat pumps. The outreach forged relationships with leadership at the Arlington Public Schools and the Arlington Housing Authority, which remain committed to electrification and will continue to work with the Town to find funding for the proposed project. The feasibility project has also prompted conversation among the Clean Energy Future Committee, the Arlington Gas Leaks Task Force, the Multi Town Gas Leaks Initiative, and Mothers Out Front regarding the gas to geothermal/electric transition. Staff and advocates are strategizing to support neighborhood-scale decarbonization that also addresses gas leaks and involves engagement with the Department of Public Utilities, the gas and electric utilities, and potential funders.
Many new opportunities formed from this, many residents who were not previously involved in any sustainable focused groups or initiatives.
One gap that we had was the lack of translation services, our survey and printed materials were all translated but we were not able to host info sessions for residents who might struggle with English. This was not due to lack of funding, it was due to unsuccessful outreach to these neighborhoods in town. Specifically, our Brazilian community which is growing, has been very difficult to connect with. There are several Brazilian businesses and community groups in town that even when sent information from the town they do not respond to. Our goal is to build a connection and eventually get the Brazilian community involved and educated about Networked Geothermal.
Despite trying to reach out and hold conversations with potential partners, no major partnerships were developed as part of this feasibility study. Further outreach was not conducted because it was found that the thermal energy network would be less cost effective than alternative heat pump technology, likely because the density and diversity of the network was not favorable. With expanded development in the area, it may become economically viable in the future. Early collaboration and relationship building should be integrated into the future planning and development process.
Collaboration with UMass LARP as well as the school system’s Facilities team (who are enthusiastic about geothermal) represent some new connections made that could prove helpful in the future. The Town’s MVP Core Group and Energy Conservation Committee can continue to serve to steer the project in the future. The Franklin Regional Council of Governments (FRCOG) will also be bringing up the study at their next regional energy committee meeting.
With residential feedback and engagement being overwhelmingly positive, this has spurred the Gloucester Team to begin planning for future bore hole tests to further pursue implementing a networked geothermal system beneath Gloucester High School, Lincoln Park housing, and surrounding critical social facilities. We will continue collaborating with the non-profit TownGreen to promote these efforts and continue to engage residents in the conversations around energy efficiency.
Green Newton researched low income housing that is adjacent to buildings that would offer diverse energy usage, such as a grocery store that uses significant cooling. We have identified one low- income building that would be interested in participating in a pilot. We are beginning conversations with the adjacent businesses to explore potential interest.
The most valuable connections made through this project were with building owners. Many buildings on the site are owned by regional or national companies with independent decarbonization goals that make them especially interested in the opportunity. Forming these connections now position Lexington well to leverage those relationships in a future stage of the project. There were also connections formed with individual residents who could serve as champions for the project in the future.
Community conversations have highlighted several new opportunities for energy resilience and sustainability projects within the city. A notable example is the interest from the local private owner of the James Arnold Mansion. Communication has been initiated, building specifics are understood, and the exploration of solar and geothermal options has begun.
The Energy Office has also established a new relationship with the New Bedford Housing Authority (NBHA), fostering potential future partnerships on efficiency projects. A company in the New Bedford Business Park has expressed curiosity about energy initiatives, opening doors for further communication and potential future collaboration. Additionally, because of feedback gained during the community outreach phase, the need for more educational programs on sustainability has been confirmed. These developments strengthen the city’s foundation for advancing energy resilience and sustainability efforts.
Several new opportunities emerged from this study ranging from new partnerships developed between study participants, the power of optimism that emerged from our public engagements, the potential for prosumer partnerships for nonprofits with large parking lots in the study area, and very enthusiastic support from study entities who realized that networked geothermal could potentially replace their aging fossil fuel energy systems entirely. Study leaders have taken advantage of the tremendous value of relationship building that was derived from the study and can plainly see how this will positively inform and impact the future development of this study into an actual networked geothermal system in our community. This included vital relationships with city and community leaders, business owners and area residents who were fully engaged with the study’s impact and scope.
The city is continuing its investigation into two other possible network sites in the city and is actively looking to advance the project with new funding to address logistical, legal, and technical implementation